The Art of Reconnecting… Or, Is It Time to Walk Away? [Consulting Firm Success Practice]
You can easily master a valuable technique that will improve your consulting firm’s new business pipeline. However, the article also requires your participation.
You’re willing to play along? Great, let’s dive in!
The 1:1:1 message is incredibly effective for warming up cool connections and fanning life into almost-dead relationships.*
(If you’re not familiar with the 1:1:1 message, please briefly scan this article.)
Plus, because 1:1:1 messages are so easy to write, once you become adept at them, you can fire off 10-15 of them quickly. In a short amount of time you can feel darn good about your outreach efforts for the week.
But, perhaps it’s not as easy peasy as chocolate squeezy.
Let’s say Skip Doff hired your consulting firm a number of years ago. Even though you delivered a successful consulting project, after the engagement ended, your ongoing outreach to Skip was spotty, especially during busy times for your firm.
Now it’s been years since you’ve had any sort of conversation with Skip, so you send Skip the following 1:1:1 message on LinkedIn:
Hi Skip.
It’s been waaaay too long since we’ve connected. You got promoted to CMO?! Congratulations! That’s a big jump in responsibility. Do you like the role?
Lo and behold, Skip responds. 1:1:1 works! (No surprise. The 1:1:1 format rocks.)
Thanks for reaching out. I became CMO in May when Brian left. Yes, I love the position. Take care.
Dang, that response was pretty tepid! ☹️
What’s your next step?
Remember I told you participation was required in this article? Now’s the time.
Before you continue reading, please post in the comments whether you would send a response to Skip or not. If yes, what would the gist of your follow-up message be? If not, why not?
Text and images are © 2024 David A. Fields, all rights reserved.
Hi, David —
Great topic and l love the interactive challenge you pose to us, your readers.
. . . I would definitely be inclined to respond: Skip has provided me with the opportunity to congratulate him on his new position at the very least. I then might offer to send an article on a new marketing approach I had recently come upon and invite a follow-up conversation about it.
Thanks, David.
Great instincts, Carole. Offering an article in a third or fourth interaction is a nice idea. Congratulating him is right on the mark! Thanks for playing along, Carole!
I would respond to Skip and say, “Again congratulations on the promotion to CMO! That’s really exciting. I’m curious Skip what is your biggest challenge with transitioning roles when someone leaves the company? I would love to talk to you about that if you have 15 minutes sometime within the next two weeks. Looking forward to talking to you soon.
You have outstanding instincts, Shiyterea! I wonder a little bit about the topic you’ve chosen, as it’s not obviously on Skip’s radar; however, let’s assume you did a little bit of digging and you noticed that his company lost a few employees from Skip’s new department. Then, you could say, “I noticed a few senior level people have left the marketing group, and I’m curious how you’ve been transitioning roles. Are you open to a quick conversation to share how you’ve handled it?” One idea to consider, Shiytera is adding a direct ask: “Are you open to a conversation?” That will generally increase the response rate.
I’m so glad you contributed into this conversation, Shiyterea!
Thank you David for your response and insight into this! Having a direct ask is more powerful than being passive and making sure that the topic I introduce into the discussion is relevant to Skip at the moment!
Have a great day David!
We’re all learning, Shiyterea. I appreciate your willingness to share and learn with this community!
OK, I’ll play! I would definitely reply as a) he responded! and b) his response indicates he remembers who I am. I would take that perceived lack of overt enthusiasm as his merely not being ready to engage me at this time, so I would continue to nurture the relationship from here. Now to go back and read the rest of the article and hope I haven’t embarrassed myself lol!
Winner winner, chicken dinner, Iain! Good on you for keeping the conversation alive and for recognizing that his response is a positive sign. Instead of taking his lack of enthusiasm as an indicator of his desire to engage with you (which is about you), you might consider that the tenor of his response is about him–maybe he’s just very busy, or feeling terse for some reason having nothing to do with you.
Well done, Iain. Thanks for joining the fray!
Skip,
Fantastic to hear you’re enjoying the CMO role.
I’d love to hear about your experience so far.
Would you be open to a short call to catch up in March?
– Will
Dang, Will, you’re an A+ consultant! Of course, anyone who knows you knows you’re the very best there is when it comes to interpersonal interactions.
Your response is excellent, and the only tweak to consider is tightening the inquiry about his experience to a narrower topic. We’ve found that people respond better to specifics and that they can sometimes run away from topics that seem too big. “I’d love to hear about your dinner at French Laundry” is easier to respond to than, “I’d love to hear about your fine dining exploits.”
Thanks so much for modeling excellence, Will!
Yes, I would respond and I would ask him something more specific about the role and why he likes it and maybe what’s next for him?
Nicely done, John. Especially the specific question about his role. Asking what’s next may be better for the voice-to-voice conversation. In a message it may actually stop the engagement because Skip has to take time to think about his answer. Plus, he may not want to put his answer into writing (if, for instance, the next step is to leave his company).
Outstanding participation, John!
Skip,
Great to hear – would love to catch up and hear more about the new role – are you available on this date and time? Look forward to catching up!
Nice one, Kevin. Good on you for responding to Skip, and you’re definitely on the right track with your response. Our experience has been that jumping directly to the specific date and time request reduces the engagement rate. One more response from Skip before moving to the date and time seems to work a bit better. Try playing with your own contacts both ways (waiting/not waiting before the specific date time request), and let me know how it turns out for you.
I very much appreciate your playing along, Kevin!